Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!usc!sdd.hp.com!decwrl!ucbvax!PUCC.PRINCETON.EDU!LVARIAN
From: LVARIAN@PUCC.PRINCETON.EDU ("Lee C. Varian")
Newsgroups: comp.protocols.tcp-ip
Subject: Re: Network Temperature Protocol
Message-ID: <9007241509.AA08833@ucbvax.Berkeley.EDU>
Date: 24 Jul 90 14:07:49 GMT
References: <mcc@WLV.IMSD.CONTEL.COM>
Sender: daemon@ucbvax.BERKELEY.EDU
Organization: The Internet
Lines: 12

On Mon, 23 Jul 90 20:36:21 -0700 Merton Campbell Crockett said:
>The major problem with the TQP specification are in the examples at the end of
>the RFC.  The +22 is excesively warm--the -3 is more appropriate of the two
>examples.  There is enough medical evidence to suggest that +22 is not
>conducive
>to mental activity.

Merton,  I think your Celsius to Farenheit converter may be overheated.
+22 C = +72 F (fairly comfortable).  BTW, the temperature in Phoenix
reached +50 C = +122 F about two weeks ago -- now that is hot!
  Lee Varian
  Princeton University