Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rutgers!ucsd!sdd.hp.com!decwrl!ucbvax!RT-JQJ.STANFORD.EDU!jqj
From: jqj@RT-JQJ.STANFORD.EDU (JQ Johnson)
Newsgroups: comp.protocols.tcp-ip
Subject: RE: Network Temperature Protocol
Message-ID: <9007242321.AA21214@rt-jqj.Stanford.EDU>
Date: 24 Jul 90 23:21:16 GMT
Sender: daemon@ucbvax.BERKELEY.EDU
Organization: The Internet
Lines: 9

I'm afraid we're getting too serious about this "Temperature Quote Protocol"
stuff.  If anyone is tempted to get serious about it, they should write
an experimental MIB and offer temperature/humidity/... as SNMP variables,
not using yet another protocol.

The above in response to Bob's query:
>Is there already such a beast in the RFC's?

I do NOT believe there is an appropriate MIB yet.