Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rutgers!cs.utexas.edu!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!ucbvax!cs.athabascau.ca!lyndon From: lyndon@cs.athabascau.ca Newsgroups: comp.soft-sys.andrew Subject: Re: Why isn't ATK more widely used? Message-ID: Date: 27 Jul 90 09:21:43 GMT References: <104319@convex.convex.com> Sender: daemon@ucbvax.BERKELEY.EDU Organization: The Internet Lines: 8 > >- printing for all of ATK is very delicate. It requires that one have > >AT&T ditroff, and Adobe's transcript package. > > Wouldn't another *roff clone work as well? How's Transcript required? Presumably the only ditroff facility required is the ability to embed postscript source within the troff document. GNU roff provides this facility, and I'm looking at using it as a replacement *roff backend.