Xref: utzoo gnu.misc.discuss:1271 comp.sources.d:5677 Path: utzoo!utgpu!watserv1!watmath!uunet!samsung!usc!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!lavaca.uh.edu!uhnix1!sugar!ficc!peter From: peter@ficc.ferranti.com (Peter da Silva) Newsgroups: gnu.misc.discuss,comp.sources.d Subject: Re: The Official Word on Citations in FSF Works Message-ID: <4US4HY@xds13.ferranti.com> Date: 20 Jul 90 17:01:18 GMT References: <3014@skye.ed.ac.uk> <1990Jul18.145521.11726@murdoch.acc.Virginia.EDU> <1990Jul18.211712.27198@ico.isc.com> <1990Jul19.004300.19165@murdoch.acc.Virginia.EDU> Reply-To: peter@ficc.ferranti.com (Peter da Silva) Organization: Xenix Support, FICC Lines: 10 Personally, I don't think this is a case of "censorship". I do think it's pretty damn petty on the part of the editor, but that's another matter. However: In article <1990Jul19.004300.19165@murdoch.acc.Virginia.EDU> gsh7w@astsun9.astro.Virginia.EDU (Greg S. Hennessy) writes: > A newspaper reporter is not censoring if he > fails to include everything you say if you are interviewed. That depends on what he fails to include. -- Peter da Silva. `-_-' +1 713 274 5180. 'U`