Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!uunet!mcsun!inria!laas!ralph From: ralph@laas.fr (Ralph P. Sobek) Newsgroups: comp.sources.wanted Subject: Get UUD/UUE !! (was Re: Need C source for uuencode) Summary: UUD and UUE are better Message-ID: Date: 25 Jul 90 13:40:12 GMT References: <1990Jul12.120013.13853@lth.se> <1990Jul13.155655.3584@lth.se> Sender: news@laas.laas.fr Reply-To: ralph@laas.fr Organization: LAAS-CNRS France Lines: 19 In-reply-to: d89cb@efd.lth.se's message of 13 Jul 90 15:56:55 GMT I hope that you were sent the advanced versions known as uud and uue! The only difference is that uud uses an optional ASCII header in the case that the UUEncoded file gets munged by BITNET or such, and it accepts multi-part files that may be produced by uue! I reccomend them both. Ralph P. Sobek Disclaimer: The above ruminations are my own. ralph@laas.fr Addresses are ordered by importance. ralph@laas.uucp, or ...!uunet!laas!ralph If all else fails, try: sobek@eclair.Berkeley.EDU =============================================================================== Reliable software should kill people reliably! -Andy Mickel, Pascal News #13,78 -- Ralph P. Sobek Disclaimer: The above ruminations are my own. ralph@laas.fr Addresses are ordered by importance. ralph@laas.uucp, or ...!uunet!laas!ralph If all else fails, try: sobek@eclair.Berkeley.EDU =============================================================================== Reliable software should kill people reliably! -Andy Mickel, Pascal News #13,78