Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!yale!mintaka!bloom-beacon!eru!luth!sunic!liuida!slaka!micke
From: micke@slaka.sirius.se (Mikael Karlsson)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga
Subject: Re: C post increment
Message-ID: <89573.AA89573@slaka.sirius.se>
Date: 18 Jul 90 15:36:06 GMT
Followup-To: comp.sys.amiga
Lines: 25

In message <5137@uwm.edu>, duncan@csd4.csd.uwm.edu (Shan D Duncan) writes:
>From article <13271@cbmvax.commodore.com>, by ken@cbmvax.commodore.com (Ken Farinsky - CATS):
>> In article <1990Jul18.020220.9502@msuinfo.cl.msu.edu> dailey@kira.uucp (Chris Dailey) writes:
>>>More importantly, how do you say it?  I've heard some people say "C
>>>incremented", but I always say "C plus plus".
>>
>> Common usage says "C plus plus" (although I think that this sounds stupid.)
>> I prefer "C increment".  The first article I ever read on C++ said
>> "C increment", all others have said "C plus plus", or punted and only
>> used the literal "C++".
>
>What about C more as in Semour (or however you spell the
>person's name).
>

How about "C inc" as in everything but.

/Mikael

--

 \_/   Mikael Karlsson, Lovsattersvagen 10, S-585 98  LINKOPING, SWEDEN
  V                           | micke@slaka.sirius.se
  |      Absolut Software     | micke@slaka.UUCP
 ~~~                          | {mcvax,seismo}!sunic!liuida!slaka!micke