Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!swrinde!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!uakari.primate.wisc.edu!uflorida!winnie!zach.fit.edu!rcs91900
From: rcs91900@zach.fit.edu ( Charles Stockman /ADVISOR-Clutterham)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga
Subject: Developers
Message-ID: <1257@winnie.fit.edu>
Date: 24 Jul 90 14:13:31 GMT
Sender: usenet@winnie.fit.edu
Reply-To: rcs91900@zach.fit.edu ( Charles Stockman /ADVISOR-Clutterham)
Organization: Florida Institute of Technology, ACS, Melbourne, FL
Lines: 11

I have been reading a lot of letters that tell me that in order to have a
product as good as microsoft's we need the people at microsoft to build it.

I have been reading at least one letter that saids we need some outsider to 
build us a math packages...

Here is my answer to the problem --> Instead of buying products from developers
who want to keep the amiga in the same markets (art games multimedia etc..) we
stop supporting them and start paying shareware developers, because I see them
starting to build the software we want (graph packages, math programs).  Thats
my policy from now on, stop supporting the amiga developers