Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!know!samsung!rex!ames!uhccux!virtue!comp.vuw.ac.nz!munnari.oz.au!bruce!monu1!monu3!ins624y
From: ins624y@monu3.cc.monash.edu.au (mr  r.   walker)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga
Subject: Re: Which is the best C for me?
Message-ID: <3653@monu1.cc.monash.oz>
Date: 25 Jul 90 07:00:13 GMT
Sender: news@monu1.cc.monash.oz
Organization: Monash University, Clayton, Vic 3168, Australia
Lines: 18

Quick question:
Which is the lastest/greatest C for the Amiga?  Aztec or Lattice?
Which one gives smaller/faster executables?
Does either of them have an integrated environment a la Turbo C?
What is the latest version of both?
Why doesn't Borland make an amiga C?  If they charge about the same
as their IBM prices (approx Australian $200) it would outsell both
Lattice and Aztec (around $500).
  


Thanks, Rod Walker.

PS: Has the A2000 prices come down in the States since the release of
the A3000?  It should as A2000+flicker fixer+SCSI+harddisk+extra mem
is roughly the price of a A3000/16 (or what we in Oz think it will be).
The A2000 system is DEFINITELY more expensive if you add an '030 accelerator
board.