Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!umich!samsung!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!uwm.edu!srcsip!milo!shankar From: shankar@SRC.Honeywell.COM (Subash Shankar) Newsgroups: comp.sys.apple2 Subject: Re: Vote YES on comp.sources.apple2 Message-ID: <82217@srcsip.UUCP> Date: 21 Jul 90 17:42:37 GMT References: <5669071@ub.cc.umich.edu> Sender: news@src.honeywell.COM Organization: Honeywell S&RC, Minneapolis, MN Lines: 26 Tabakal@UB.CC.UMICH.EDU > I personally do not get comp.sources.* and would probably miss > a good deal of stuff if it came in. So, you're not any worse off either with or without comp.sources.apple2. As it is, I haven't seen very many sources (heck, I haven't seen any in the last six months) in comp.sources.apple2. Obviously, people feel it inappropriate group to post sources (IMHO, they are correct), so at least let those who will get comp.sources.* have access to sources. > If anything, it may lead system administrators > to remove comp.sources.apple2 from sites, thus restricting rather > than expanding their distribution. Every other computer has a comp.sources group, and it hasn't seemed to have caused much trouble for them. Chances are, any administrator who is worried about volume will either delete the whole comp.sources hierarchy or keep them all. The Apple is only one of about 5 major lines, and it is unlikely to affect any decisions by system administrators. Vote Yes!!! --- Subash Shankar Honeywell Systems & Research Center MN65-2100 voice: (612) 782 7558 US Snail: 3660 Technology Dr., Minneapolis, MN 55418 shankar@src.honeywell.com srcsip!shankar