Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rutgers!cs.utexas.edu!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!usenet.ins.cwru.edu!skybridge!pietrzak From: pietrzak@skybridge.SCL.CWRU.Edu (John Pietrzak) Newsgroups: comp.sys.atari.st Subject: Re: Time for a New Computer: Should it be an Atari ST? Message-ID: <1990Jul24.205526.14478@usenet.ins.cwru.edu> Date: 24 Jul 90 20:55:26 GMT References: <8488@mirsa.inria.fr> <1990Jul23.214712.17020@murdoch.acc.Virginia.EDU> <1990Jul24.134702.11337@cunixf.cc.columbia.edu> Sender: John Pietrzak (pietrzak@solarium.scl.cwru.edu) Organization: Smith Undergrad Lab, CWRU, Cleve. OH Lines: 37 X-Post-Machine: solarium.scl.cwru.edu In article <1990Jul24.134702.11337@cunixf.cc.columbia.edu> cmm1@cunixa.cc.columbia.edu (Christopher M Mauritz) writes: > >I'm sick and tired of you trying to crown yourself net.moderator for >this group. Who are you to judge what is useful and what is not? >If Colas' article was useless, then so is your chastizing him for >posting it (you could've done that by email, eh?) > >I didn't see anything inciteful about the post. It was full of rather >accurate information, even if it wasn't to the liking of ST >cheerleaders like yourself. > I'm sick and tired of reading the incessant heckling of the ST in your posts, Chris. After your continual slamming of the atari, you decide to post a message declaiming those who provide the inverse service to this newsgroup. You've essentially crowned yourself head.flamer for c.s.a.s.. (And why should anyone use email, with your sterling examples to guide them?) > >I was under the impression that Turbo C was only available in Europe >and that GCC is PD (no professional support)?? > I wouldn't know about Turbo C, but GCC for the Atari ST is officially sanctioned by the Free Software Foundation, which is as much as it gets for any machine on which it runs. The faculty at CWRU seem to consider this enough, as GCC is the compiler used on the majority of the workstations I've seen (or used) at the school. > >Cheers, > >Chris J P