Xref: utzoo comp.bugs.sys5:1300 comp.sys.att:10024
Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!snorkelwacker!usc!cs.utexas.edu!texbell!dalnet!dlss2!james
From: james@dlss2.UUCP (James Cummings)
Newsgroups: comp.bugs.sys5,comp.sys.att
Subject: Re: Obscure Vi bug?
Keywords: System V 3.2.1 3B2/700
Message-ID: <94@dlss2.UUCP>
Date: 20 Jul 90 13:58:35 GMT
References: <798@intelhf.hf.intel.com> <462@hitachi.uucp>
Reply-To: james@dlss2.UUCP (James Cummings)
Followup-To: comp.bugs.sys5
Organization: RedRock Development
Lines: 27


	Yes, this appears to be a bug in vi.  I get the same results,
now that I understand the problem. 

	If a set report=1 is done there is not even a notification that
any line has been changed.

	Enviornment:
		System V r 3.2.1
		AT&T 3B2/700

		Output from "what" for vi:
  /usr/bin/vi:
   	   printf.c:2.2 6/5/79
	   /usr/bin/vi.sl 1.31 3.2 01/06/88 16362 AT&T-SF


-- 
=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+
|Disclaimer:                      | James Cummings                           |
|  You can't blame me!            |   UUCP:                                  |
|  I'm ignorant!                  |    ..swblat!{texbell!texnet..            |
|+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+|              swgate!dlss1..}!dlss2!james |
|Send flames to:                  |   NET:                                   |
|  sowc@devnull.com               |      jc@smunews                          |
|                                 |                                          |
=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+