Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!samsung!sol.ctr.columbia.edu!emory!hubcap!ncrcae!PEDEV!rogerson
From: rogerson@PEDEV.Columbia.NCR.COM (Dale Rogerson)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.misc
Subject: Re: Windows/Windows SDK & non-Microsoft
Message-ID: <3172@PEDEV.Columbia.NCR.COM>
Date: 24 Jul 90 15:06:15 GMT
References: <163338@<1990Jul21> <46500145@uxa.cso.uiuc.edu>
Reply-To: rogerson@PEDEV.Columbia.NCR.COM (Dale Rogerson)
Organization: NCR Corp., Engineering & Manufacturing - Columbia, SC
Lines: 31

In article <46500145@uxa.cso.uiuc.edu> dlg6627@uxa.cso.uiuc.edu writes:
>
>
>>	Is it possible to use a C compiler with the Windows SDK other than
>>Microsoft C?  I'm specifically thinking of Turbo C 2.0/Turbo C++ 1.0.

	Currently these are the compilers that I know are reported to work
	with the Windows environment.  Notice that NONE of Borland products
	are on this list - i.e. Turbo C++/C *DO NOT* produce Windows
	compatible code ( TLINK will also not work for Windows applications).


	Actor
	ParcPlace SmallTalk-80
	StepStone Objective C
	C_Talk/Views
	Stony Brook Modula-2
	Topspeed Modula-2 
	Topspeed C	
	Glockenspiel C++(Requries MS-C ?)
	Watcom C
	Zortech C
	Zortech C++
	Turbo Assembler :-)

	Anybody have anything to add to this list?
	Maybe we should start making a Windows Compatible development tools
	list a monthly posting on comp.windows.ms.

	-----Dale
		Rogerson-----