Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!sdd.hp.com!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!sunybcs!uhura.cc.rochester.edu!ttak
From: ttak@uhura.cc.rochester.edu (Timothy Takahashi)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.misc
Subject: Re: DR DOS
Message-ID: <8593@ur-cc.UUCP>
Date: 25 Jul 90 20:14:31 GMT
References: <1990Jul25.144143.28824@ddsw1.MCS.COM>
Reply-To: ttak@uhura.cc.rochester.edu (Timothy Takahashi)
Organization: University of Rochester
Lines: 12

In article <1990Jul25.144143.28824@ddsw1.MCS.COM> ebrill@ddsw1.MCS.COM (Edward Brill) writes:
>Digital Research established DR DOS in the market because it was available
>early on as a ROM chip...something Microsoft has only recently done with
>MS DOS.

This is really weird, because this is the first time I've ever heard of DR DOS.
Many years ago, I remember hearing that Concurrent CP/M 86 was to be
partially IBM PC-DOS compatible...... what else (specifically) has used
DR-DOS.


tim