Xref: utzoo comp.os.os9:1086 comp.sys.m6809:1266 comp.sys.m68k:1781 Path: utzoo!attcan!telly!lethe!geac!yunexus!ists!gkcl!os9paul From: os9paul@gkcl.ists.ca (Paul Good) Newsgroups: comp.os.os9,comp.sys.m6809,comp.sys.m68k Subject: Re: the OSKer Message-ID: <10791@ists.ists.ca> Date: 23 Jul 90 03:56:40 GMT References: <1990Jul19.191038.12929@hummer.iupui.edu> <1990Jul20.031520.24021@ecn.purdue.edu> Sender: news@ists.ists.ca Reply-To: os9paul@gkcl.UUCP (Paul Good) Followup-To: comp.os.os9 Organization: y Lines: 38 In article <1990Jul20.031520.24021@ecn.purdue.edu> dev@ei.ecn.purdue.edu (Larry Weeks) writes: >He's sacrificed much of his time and money to support OS9. Or perhaps he has 'invested' his time and money in the hopes of turning a profit. >More power to him. For putting out a magazine for the OSK/OS9 community: YES. For advertising on Usenet: NO! >The Usenet is for the free dissemination of information. Yes, it is. BUT it is not to be used for free advertising of your products. Have you read your users' info material lately? Product announcements are allowed; commercial advertising is not. If Scott had made one announcement of his new magazine, not many would have complained. He has however issued a number (it's coming, it's here, still some free issues available). >And while the "commercial" offers of misc.forsale purporting to get >you easy money are indeed in very poor taste, his offer was far from >that. I'm not sure what your point is here. Is it that some people break the rules, so Scott should be allowed to as well? >Geesh, no gratitude. No wonder there is so little motivation to >develop for OS9. Let's hope the MM1, Paul, Kevin, and other people like >Scott change that. It appears you are confused as to what the actual issue is. I'm sure there are many people that appreciate efforts to expand the OSK universe. However, that does not require them to grant carte blanche to step on the Usenet guidelines. Paul Good INTERNET: os9paul@gkcl.ists.ca UUCP: ists!gkcl.ists.ca!os9paul