Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!samsung!sdd.hp.com!ucsd!ucbvax!MCIRPS2.MED.NYU.EDU!root From: root@MCIRPS2.MED.NYU.EDU Newsgroups: comp.sys.sgi Subject: X11R4: who has what ??? Message-ID: <9007190859.AA25709@mcirps2.med.nyu.edu> Date: 20 Jul 90 09:55:26 GMT Sender: usenet@ucbvax.BERKELEY.EDU Organization: The Internet Lines: 31 X-Unparsable-Date: Thu, 19 Jul 90 01:59:06 DSD I am confused about distribution/right to use of X11 software. I understand that sgi offers an x11 developers package, which costs money, which is partly to pay royalites to the X people(mit ?). We have a summer student here who is putting up X11R4 from mit which is available via anonmymous ftp over the net from mit. While we have not yet gotten the source code to compile, the binaries from the net work fine... (I don't know if we got the binary object code archives, or if already compiled and ready to link archives are available). My question is: Who owns X for sgi machines ? If it is available over the net, why does sgi need to sell it ? What are the contractual and legal issues that a developer such as ourselves should know about the X from sgi or mit ? Why does sgi sell X for so much(how much ?) when mit has it for free ? Which package offering is better, or more directly, which should I use as a sgi software developer ? dan. -- +-----------------------------------------------------------------------------+ | karron@nyu.edu Dan Karron | | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . New York University Medical Center | | 560 First Avenue \ \ Pager <1> (212) 397 9330 | | New York, New York 10016 \**\ <2> 10896 <3> | | (212) 340 5210 \**\__________________________________________ | +-----------------------------------------------------------------------------+