Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!swrinde!emory!mephisto!mcnc!xanth!virgil!wyvern!tmanos
From: tmanos@wyvern.UUCP (Tom Manos)
Newsgroups: comp.unix.i386
Subject: Re: term entry for procomm +
Summary: Pcplus vt102 works fine for me
Message-ID: <299@wyvern.UUCP>
Date: 21 Jul 90 14:48:24 GMT
References: <26a26762-6bbcomp.unix.i386@tronsbox.xei.com>
Organization: wyvern - Norfolk, VA
Lines: 14

In article <26a26762-6bbcomp.unix.i386@tronsbox.xei.com>, tron1@tronsbox.xei.com (HIM) writes:
> Many of my DOS users call in with Procomm and Procomm + , the ANSI-BBS mode
> on this is non-standard and the VT-100 is the pits.
I run a UNIX box, which I routinely (daily) call with a DOS machine running
Procomm+, and I find the vt102 mode to be great.  I had BIG troubles using
it until I turned off the "destructive backspace" setting in setup.  I think
it was in the terminal emulation section of the setup.  Once I did that, I
was able to edit fine using vi.  What problems are your DOS users having with
Procomm?

-- 
Tom Manos @ wyvern     Norfolk, VA
UUCP       uunet!xanth!virgil!wyvern!tmanos
INTERNET   manost@dca-ems.dca.mil