Path: utzoo!utgpu!watserv1!watmath!att!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!ucbvax!ucsd!sdd.hp.com!samsung!uunet!crdgw1!antarctica!davidsen From: davidsen@antarctica.crd.GE.COM (william E Davidsen) Newsgroups: comp.unix.questions Subject: Re: Unnecessarily long pipelines (was Re: How do you handle while(1) fork(); ?) Message-ID: <10177@crdgw1.crd.ge.com> Date: 23 Jul 90 13:48:29 GMT References: <2358@root44.co.uk> Sender: news@crdgw1.crd.ge.com Reply-To: davidsen@crdos1.crd.ge.com (bill davidsen) Organization: GE Corporate R&D Center, Schenectady NY Lines: 9 In article <2358@root44.co.uk>, gwc@root.co.uk (Geoff Clare) writes: |> Why is it that people string together lots of "grep" commands in a |> pipeline, when they could do the same job with a single "sed" or "awk" |> command? In this case it's even worse, because "awk" is already in |> there as well! Or egrep, or whatever. Maybe becauses it's easier to type?