Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!romp!auschs!awdprime!doorstop.austin.ibm.com!tif
From: tif@doorstop.austin.ibm.com (Paul Chamberlain)
Newsgroups: comp.unix.questions
Subject: Re: /rsh and /usr/bin/mailx - are they incompatible?
Keywords: rsh,mailx,restricted,mail
Message-ID: <2911@awdprime.UUCP>
Date: 25 Jul 90 17:47:05 GMT
References: <1733@tssi.UUCP> <2834@awdprime.UUCP> <1990Jul24.141800.15561@warwick.ac.uk>
Sender: news@awdprime.UUCP
Reply-To: tif@doorstop.austin.ibm.com (Paul Chamberlain)
Organization: IBM AWD, Austin, TX
Lines: 12

In article <1990Jul24.141800.15561@warwick.ac.uk> cudcv@warwick.ac.uk writes:
>In article <2834@awdprime.UUCP> tif@doorstop.austin.ibm.com writes:
>>Try setting PAGER=more and making sure more is in the search path.
>But doesn't this blow away the whole point of using rsh, because you can ...

Yes, but I thought that that was sufficiently complicated that I did not
want to spoil it for others.  That one little hole kinda ruins rsh.
That was why I mentioned that they might disable the pager.  At least
they could still use mail (no editor though).

Paul Chamberlain | I do NOT represent IBM         tif@doorstop, sc30661@ausvm6
512/838-7008     | ...!cs.utexas.edu!ibmaus!auschs!doorstop.austin.ibm.com!tif