Xref: utzoo comp.unix.wizards:22966 alt.security:1131
Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!cs.utexas.edu!rutgers!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!torsqnt!lethe!yunexus!shields
From: shields@yunexus.YorkU.CA (Paul Shields)
Newsgroups: comp.unix.wizards,alt.security
Subject: Re: Hard links to directories: why not?
Summary: You haven't lived until you've tried this.
Keywords: ln, directories, security...
Message-ID: <12877@yunexus.YorkU.CA>
Date: 19 Jul 90 04:26:33 GMT
References: <5222@milton.u.washington.edu>
Organization: York U. Computing Services
Lines: 32

wiml@milton.u.washington.edu (William Lewis) writes:
>   In the man entry for ln(1) (and for link(2)),  it says that
>hard links may not be made to directories, unless the linker is
>the super-user (in order to make '.' and '..', I suppose). My 
>question is: why not? (and is there any reason that I, if I'm
>root, shouldn't do this?)

Imagine the fun a user could have with the following:

% ln . foo
% ln .. bar

It would annoy a lot of the utilities you might like to run, like
du, ls -R, etc.

>It seems perfectly harmless to me, although 
>it would allow the user to make a pretty convoluted directory structure,
>that's the user's priviledge. So I suppose it's probably a security
>issue somehow (restrictions of this sort seem to be). Hence the
>crosspost to alt.security. 

Well, perhaps the following could be hazardous:

# rm -r bar

Just a thought.

-- 
Paul Shields             shields@nccn.yorku.ca

P.S: on VAX/VMS 3.7 the above (with a different command set of course)
is possible. I don't know about old versions of UNIX.