Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!cs.utexas.edu!helios!diamond!rajeshg
From: rajeshg@diamond.tamu.edu (Rajesh Godbole)
Newsgroups: comp.windows.x
Subject: Re: X11R4 version of xdbx?
Message-ID: <6890@helios.TAMU.EDU>
Date: 26 Jul 90 16:38:52 GMT
References: <25684@bellcore.bellcore.com> <1990Jul25.205945.5081@ncsuvx.ncsu.edu>
Sender: usenet@helios.TAMU.EDU
Reply-To: rajeshg@diamond.tamu.edu (Rajesh Godbole)
Organization: Texas A&M University Agriculture Engineering Department
Lines: 22

In article <1990Jul25.205945.5081@ncsuvx.ncsu.edu>, tkl@osl.ncsu.edu
(Tim Lowman) writes:
|> In article <25684@bellcore.bellcore.com> lestat@nontech.Berkeley.EDU
(David Gonzalez-Nieves) writes:
|> >	We are currently using the one available from expo.lcs.mit.edu under
|> >X11R4 and it seems to work fine even though it is designed for X11R3. We
|> >
|> ...
|> Then when you try to step through the program, it says that it can't find
|> the file the procedure was compiled in.
|> ...
|> Also another annoying feature is that you can click on the "file" button and
|> the machine will either show you the files or crash in a malloc error.

we have the same problem on a 3/260 using xdbx from expo.lcs.mit.edu.
i wonder if someone has fixed this bug.  a working version of xdbx 
could be pretty useful.

Rajesh Godbole,				|  preferred: rajeshg@diamond.tamu.edu
Department of Electrical Engineering.	|  otherwise: godbole@eemips.tamu.edu
Texas A&M University, College Station.	|  (409) 696-9528.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------