Path: utzoo!mnetor!tmsoft!torsqnt!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!clyde.concordia.ca!mcgill-vision!snorkelwacker!usc!sdd.hp.com!apollo!rutgers!cs.utexas.edu!uwm.edu!ux1.cso.uiuc.edu!csrd.uiuc.edu!sp31.csrd.uiuc.edu!davej From: davej@sp31.csrd.uiuc.edu (David J. Jablonowski) Newsgroups: comp.windows.x.motif Subject: Re: Training courses in X, Motif Message-ID: <4bb71775.20b6d@apollo.HP.COM> Date: 20 Jul 90 20:06:00 GMT References: <816@agcsun.UUCP> <14058@gouda.quad.com> Sender: root@apollo.HP.COM Reply-To: davej@sp31.csrd.uiuc.edu (David J. Jablonowski) Organization: Center for Supercomputing Research and Development Lines: 29 To: comp-windows-x-motif@rutgers.edu I was going to keep quiet on the request for MOTIF training, but since someone recommended ICS as providing excellent MOTIF and X training I feel I should throw in my $.02 I attended a week-long ICS course last fall. I thought the following. 1) The course was grossly over-priced based on the actual amount of class time we had. Granted, lab time is important in this type of training, but the price should accordingly reflect the heavy bias toward lab time. Furthermore, the instructors were not too helpful in the lab. They were either too busy playing with their own 'toy programs', or were unable to address difficult problems without sitting at your terminal and trying various alternatives. 2) They allowed a too wide range of experience levels in a single classroom. I have a very strong C background and a medium X and Widget background. There were people in the class that had no X and Widget background and were very very weak in C. 3) The instructors had a real attitude. They made me feel that I should be priveleged to be in the presence of such 'masters'. The series of books by O'Reilly & Associates provide an excellent tutorial and reference for both Xlib and the Toolkit Intrinsics. Couple this with the MOTIF manuals and the MOTIF example programs, and I think a week would be much more productive trying to teach yourself.