Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!yale!bunker!hcap!hnews!369!19!Debbie.Hazelton
From: Debbie.Hazelton@f19.n369.z1.fidonet.org (Debbie Hazelton)
Newsgroups: misc.handicap
Subject: Re: Arkenstone
Message-ID: <12987@bunker.UUCP>
Date: 20 Jul 90 20:21:15 GMT
Sender: wtm@bunker.UUCP
Reply-To: Debbie.Hazelton@f19.n369.z1.fidonet.org
Distribution: misc
Organization: FidoNet node 1:369/19 - The InnerSight Conn, Deerfield Beach FL
Lines: 22
Approved: wtm@bunker.UUCP

Index Number: 9377

[This is from the Blink Talk Conference]

 > There is one little fact that we should remember. Their will probably 
 > never be a scanning system which is absolute perfect.  They claim that 
 > the system has about a 90 percent rate of reading correctly.  Even the 
 > Kurzweil makes loads of mistakes.

 Well yeah.  I have been hearing the the Arkenstone has been doing
 better than the Kurzweill for quite awhile, although there are some who
 still feel it is superior.  Nevertheless, it seems to me that these
 devices will yet be further improved.  It just takes time to get all
 the bugs out and to cover all the ways they need to be able to work for
 us.  I believe they will be improved upon.  Will they ever be perfect?
 Well I don't know, but I like to think they'll be much closer to that.

Deb Hazelton

--
Uucp: ..!{decvax,oliveb}!bunker!hcap!hnews!369!19!Debbie.Hazelton
Internet: Debbie.Hazelton@f19.n369.z1.fidonet.org