Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!yale!bunker!hcap!hnews!129!90!Gary.Petraccaro
From: Gary.Petraccaro@f90.n129.z1.fidonet.org (Gary Petraccaro)
Newsgroups: misc.handicap
Subject: Re: KPR VS. Arkenstone
Message-ID: <13041@bunker.UUCP>
Date: 23 Jul 90 20:32:00 GMT
Sender: wtm@bunker.UUCP
Reply-To: Gary.Petraccaro@f90.n129.z1.fidonet.org
Distribution: misc
Organization: FidoNet node 1:129/90 - Post Road Inn, Greensburg PA
Lines: 18
Approved: wtm@bunker.UUCP

Index Number: 9415

[This is from the Blink Talk Conference]

Chip,

     Thanks for the KPR/Arkenstone comparison.  Covered all my concerns
except one.  From your message I get the impression that the Arkenstone you
used only had a 300 dpi scanner.  Isn't there a 400 dpi scanner now
available for the Arkenstone and do you think that would make books more
readable?

                                Thanks,
                                Gary

--
Uucp: ..!{decvax,oliveb}!bunker!hcap!hnews!129!90!Gary.Petraccaro
Internet: Gary.Petraccaro@f90.n129.z1.fidonet.org