Path: utzoo!utgpu!watserv1!watmath!att!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!ucsd!usc!snorkelwacker!bloom-beacon!GAFFA.MIT.EDU!Love-Hounds-request
From: Love-Hounds-request@GAFFA.MIT.EDU
Newsgroups: rec.music.gaffa
Subject: TSW & sound quality!!
Message-ID: <24981.9007231149@cck.cov.ac.uk>
Date: 23 Jul 90 13:49:52 GMT
Sender: Love-Hounds-request@gaffa.MIT.EDU
Reply-To: Love-Hounds@gaffa.MIT.EDU
Organization: The Internet
Lines: 19
Approved: love-hounds@eddie.mit.edu

Really-From: Andrew Semple <sre017%cck.cov.ac.uk@mitvma.mit.edu>

I have just come to the Polytechnic computer centre during my vacation,to catch
up on the digest.It was not hard to notice all the arguments over the sound
quality of TSW,so i decided to add my say!!
  I've never been bothered unduly by sound quality of any album,and I'm never
likely to either.If I based my choice of best albums on sound quality,I would
only ever listen to PG4-Peter Gabriel,rather restrictive really?It is the qu

quality of the music and lyrics that count,not the sound quality.On that count
TSW is definately a brilliant album,as are all Kate's albums.I'm not against
good sound quality,I absolutely adore PG4,but other factors are more important
than how my 'hi-fi' reproduces it!!


    'I need someone to believe in,someone to trust'--Gabriel '74


          Andy Semple  sre017@uk.ac.cov.cck  Cov Polytechnic UK