Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!aplcen!uakari.primate.wisc.edu!sdd.hp.com!elroy.jpl.nasa.gov!aero!vax5.cit.cornell.edu!w25y
From: w25y@vax5.cit.cornell.edu
Newsgroups: soc.feminism
Subject: Re: TFFTFM/EMILY's List
Message-ID: <4776.26aa5400@vax5.cit.cornell.edu>
Date: 23 Jul 90 05:33:52 GMT
References: <141@sierra.STANFORD.EDU>
Sender: nadel@aerospace.aero.org
Distribution: soc
Lines: 13
Approved: nadel@aerospace.aero.org
Status: R


In article <141@sierra.STANFORD.EDU>, beckwith@sierra.STANFORD.EDU (beckwith) writes:
> The Fund supports the Feminist Agenda: equality, reproductive freedom,
> peace & disarmanent, civil rights, lesbian and gay rights, economic

    If "peace & disarmament" is somehow a feminist issue, what of those women
who are trying to build military careers?  Are they barred from being 
feminists?  Or conversely, if feminism <-> peace & disarmament, does this mean
that feminists are not qualified to serve in the military? 

                   -- Paul Ciszek
                      W25Y@CRNLVAX5               Bitnet
                      W25Y@VAX5.CIT.CORNELL.EDU   Internet
                      UUNET!CORNELL!VAX5!W25Y     UUCP
"The trouble with normal is it always gets worse."  --Bruce Cockburn