Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rutgers!usc!samsung!munnari.oz.au!bunyip!psych!brolga!exnirad
From: exnirad@brolga.cc.uq.oz.au (Nirad Sharma)
Newsgroups: comp.databases
Subject: Re: Oracle TWO-TASK DRIVERS
Keywords: pipe or fast driver
Message-ID: <1990Aug1.084433.9981@brolga.cc.uq.oz.au>
Date: 1 Aug 90 08:44:33 GMT
References: <761@fdmetd.uucp>
Organization: Prentice Computer Centre, University of Queensland, Australia.
Lines: 24

In <761@fdmetd.uucp> petter@fdmetd.uucp (Petter Henrik Hansen) writes:

>Choosing a two-task driwer seems to be simple. The fast driver compared
>with the pipe driver is obviously superior.

>BUT!! There must be a drawback with this.

I don't doubt that this is true however I am having some problem getting
the fast driver to work on our system. It says something along the lines
of "server crashed". The whole machine does not, crash with it, however.

Our system :	IBM PS/2 Model 80	(8Megs RAM, 110MByte HD)
		SCO XENIX 2.3.2
		Oracle version 5

The system works fine with the pipe driver.

What am I doing wrong ?


Nirad Sharma  (exnirad@brolga.cc.uq.oz.au)
Continuing Education Unit
The University of Queensland
AUSTRALIA