Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!samsung!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!swrinde!ucsd!pacbell.com!decwrl!hayes.fai.alaska.edu!accuvax.nwu.edu!nucsrl!telecom-request
From: eli@pws.bull.com (Steve Elias)
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.telecom
Subject: Sprint Billing / Embarassing Retraction
Message-ID: <10261@accuvax.nwu.edu>
Date: 30 Jul 90 07:06:31 GMT
Sender: news@accuvax.nwu.edu
Reply-To: eli@pws.bull.com
Organization: TELECOM Digest
Lines: 11
Approved: Telecom@eecs.nwu.edu
X-Submissions-To: telecom@eecs.nwu.edu
X-Administrivia-To: telecom-request@eecs.nwu.edu
X-Telecom-Digest: Volume 10, Issue 531, Message 6 of 8


John, I don't see the point of your embarassment.  Your original
comment about Sprint's billing still stands.  It's been fixed for a
long time now.  As for the Telebit connection problem, that's another
story.  If billing is your criterion, Sprint and ATT seem to be on
equal footing.  If Telebit techno-questions with the LD carrier are
important to you, then it looks like ATT still wins.

BTW, John.  you have ten residence phone lines??  That is truly
outlandish!  And people call me a telecom geek just because I have an
800 number!