Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!accuvax.nwu.edu!nucsrl!telecom-request
From: "Michael P. Deignan" <mpd@anomaly.sbs.com>
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.telecom
Subject: Re: Neidorf Trial - Press Release on Dismissal
Message-ID: <10400@accuvax.nwu.edu>
Date: 2 Aug 90 22:44:43 GMT
Sender: news@accuvax.nwu.edu
Organization: Small Business Systems, Inc., Esmond, RI  02917
Lines: 23
Approved: Telecom@eecs.nwu.edu
X-Submissions-To: telecom@eecs.nwu.edu
X-Administrivia-To: telecom-request@eecs.nwu.edu
X-Telecom-Digest: Volume 10, Issue 539, Message 11 of 13


In article <10254@accuvax.nwu.edu> apple!well.sf.ca.us!well!
nagle@uunet.uu.net (John Nagle) writes:

>Zenner said the government's decision came after he provided the
>prosecutors copies of publicly available documents which demonstrated
>that the document Neidorf published electronically contained no secret
>information.

Should this information not have been made available during
"discovery" of the judicial process?

If it were made available during the discovery process, then why did
this trial ever get off the ground? Or, did the prosecution merely
ignore the fact that this evidence existed in the pursuit of a
witch-hunt?


Michael P. Deignan #  mpd@anomaly.sbs.com  # ...!uunet!rayssd!anomaly!mpd
Author, SCO Ported Software Compendium, and Maintainer of Online Archives
Telebit: +1 401 455 0347  Login: xxcp  Password: xenix  (local rmail ok) 
Files: /usr/spool/uucppublic/SOFTLIST   /usr/spool/uucppublic/ARCHELP