Xref: utzoo comp.lang.c++:8730 comp.software-eng:4009
Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!wuarchive!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!sdd.hp.com!ucsd!telesoft!rlk
From: rlk@telesoft.com (Bob Kitzberger @sation)
Newsgroups: comp.lang.c++,comp.software-eng
Subject: Re: Project experience with C++
Message-ID: <1020@telesoft.com>
Date: 2 Aug 90 04:48:13 GMT
References: <812@agcsun.UUCP> <222.26a42b7d@astro.pc.ab.com> <294.26b56ac2@astro.pc.ab.com>
Organization: TeleSoft, San Diego, CA.
Lines: 20

In article <294.26b56ac2@astro.pc.ab.com>, klimas@astro.pc.ab.com writes:
>
> 	Whether C++ is a better OOP than
> 	one of the other languages I am not going to initiate yet another
> 	language war, I believe that a process of evolutionary natural 
> 	selection will resolve the winner much more conclusively than any 
> 	articulate debate will.

"Evolutionary natural selection" won't prove which is better, merely
which survives.  The two aren't necessarily the same, as non-technical
issues often overshadow technical issues.  

	.Bob.
-- 
Bob Kitzberger               Internet : rlk@telesoft.com
TeleSoft                     uucp     : ...!ucsd.ucsd.edu!telesoft!rlk
5959 Cornerstone Court West
San Diego, CA   92121-9891   "There's too much caffeine in your bloodstream..."
(619) 457-2700 x163                                              -- The Smiths
------------------------------------------------------------------------------