Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!clyde.concordia.ca!uunet!willett!ForthNet
From: ForthNet@willett.UUCP (ForthNet articles from GEnie)
Newsgroups: comp.lang.forth
Subject: forth eng./68hc11 new micros
Message-ID: <1442.UUL1.3#5129@willett.UUCP>
Date: 1 Aug 90 02:30:32 GMT
Organization: String, Scotch tape, and Paperclips.  (in Pgh, PA)
Lines: 26


 Date: 07-30-90 (10:13)              Number: 685 (Echo)
   To: JODY WEBER                    Refer#: 681
 From: DAVID ALBERT                    Read: NO
 Subj: 68HC11?                       Status: PUBLIC MESSAGE

 Hi Jody,
    Well, I am not sure I can give you a direct answer.  I have been
 building some voice based low-power computers based on the 80C188 for
 fun and for some handicapped folks.  Previously, I had no interest in
 embedded control applications.  I am now looking for a good, very low
 power MCU that I can take the time to learn well, and will suffice for
 most control apps including motor control, alarm applications, etc.  I
 suspect for high powered processing, I will still use the C188 or maybe
 the 80376 (I am giving that a try now).  Since I know 808x assembler
 rather well, it is just easiest.
    My requirements are that it be in-expensive enough to embed as many
 and as often as needed, and also that it be VERY low power (the lower
 the better).  Naturally, it must also have a decent array of on board
 features and a reasonable instruction set.  (I suppose I want what every
 other designer wants).
    If you have a personal favorite embedded MCU, or any suggestions, I
 would appreciate hearing about them.  Thanks for your help!
-----
This message came from GEnie via willett through a semi-automated process.
Report problems to: uunet!willett!dwp or willett!dwp@hobbes.cert.sei.cmu.edu