Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!snorkelwacker!usc!ucsd!ucbvax!TRANSARC.COM!Craig_Everhart
From: Craig_Everhart@TRANSARC.COM
Newsgroups: comp.mail.misc
Subject: Re: RFC 822 compliant mailing lists
Message-ID: <4ai2VNH0BwwONBgEdj@transarc.com>
Date: 2 Aug 90 13:19:21 GMT
References: <7681@gollum.twg.com>
Sender: daemon@ucbvax.BERKELEY.EDU
Lines: 20

Excerpts from netnews.comp.mail.misc: 30-Jul-90 Re: RFC 822 compliant
maili.. David S. Herron@twg.com (585)

> In article <0afOovr0BwwO0W_HRg@transarc.com> Craig_Everhart@TRANSARC.COM
> writes:
> >  Each has a
> >-request address; each rewrites the envelope-from information, but not
> >the header, for messages passing through them.

> This is what has been done by the MMDF List Channel for ages and
> ages and ages and ages.

Good news about MMDF.  I wasn't claiming any kind of uniqueness or
primacy, though; the original question was vague on ``correct behavior''
and I was filling in what I believed to be included in the definition of
same.

Sorry if this was confusing.

		Craig