Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!aplcen!uakari.primate.wisc.edu!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!lavaca.uh.edu!uhnix1!sugar!ficc!peter From: peter@ficc.ferranti.com (Peter da Silva) Newsgroups: comp.mail.uucp Subject: Re: Imminent death of UUCP Zone predicted Message-ID: <8M-4O=A@ggpc2.ferranti.com> Date: 31 Jul 90 12:05:49 GMT References: <9@raysnec.UUCP> Reply-To: peter@ficc.ferranti.com (Peter da Silva) Organization: Xenix Support, FICC Lines: 9 In article karl_kleinpaste@cis.ohio-state.edu writes: > Easy. I _expect_ that both the envelope and headers are going to be > broken and unreplyable; see above. What, because the DEC-20 down the hall violates the common sense guideline (be conservative in what you generate, be liberal in what you accept) you jump to the conclusion that everyone does? The number of unreplyable messages that *I* get are tiny... most bounces seem to be caused by temporary hardware or resource problems. -- Peter da Silva. `-_-' +1 713 274 5180. 'U`