Xref: utzoo news.groups:22756 alt.fax:814 comp.misc:9707
Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rutgers!cs.utexas.edu!sdd.hp.com!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!know!eli
From: eli@pws.bull.com (Steve Elias)
Newsgroups: news.groups,alt.fax,comp.misc
Subject: Re:  comp.dcom.fax
Message-ID: <15047@know.pws.bull.com>
Date: 1 Aug 90 11:49:55 GMT
References: <15036@know.pws.bull.com> <e947m2w162w@halcyon.wa.com>
Followup-To: news.groups
Organization: Bull Worldwide Information Systems, Inc.
Lines: 25


 ralphs@halcyon.wa.com (Ralph Sims) writes:
>eli@pws.bull.com (Steve Elias) writes:
>
>> due to an absolutely underwhelming response to the call for discussion
>> for comp.dcom.fax, i'm not going to issue a call for votes.
>
>'tis a shame.  I thought it was an inspired idea.  I haven't seen any
>discussion in alt.fax, however, so I wonder if your messages got
>propogated.

thanks for the support.  

i'll try passing on this idea to a friend of mine who has a
home system.  he's far more organized than i, and perhaps he'll 
issue a call for votes, or restart the "official usenet process".
yes, this is "passing the buck"!

another item that made me doubt the efficacy of creating a comp*fax
group is the recent discussion over which gets better propagation, 
alt.* or talk.*...  are there stats which show that comp.* gets 
better propagation than alt.*?  

-- 
/*  eli@spdcc.com   617 932 5598   fax 508 294 7556  */