Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!swrinde!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!brutus.cs.uiuc.edu!ux1.cso.uiuc.edu!midway!mimsy!mojo!disney!disney.src.umd.edu!muller
From: muller@src.umd.edu (Christophe Muller)
Newsgroups: comp.object
Subject: Re: Choice of language for manufacturing Applications
Message-ID: <MULLER.90Aug2161540@molecule.src.umd.edu>
Date: 2 Aug 90 20:15:40 GMT
References: <26686@pasteur.Berkeley.EDU>
Sender: news@ra.src.umd.edu (The News System)
Organization: SIMULOG - 3 Av. du centre - 78182 ST QUENTIN - FRANCE -
Lines: 27
In-Reply-To: lozinski@argon.uucp's message of 2 Aug 90 16:01:03 GMT

In article <26686@pasteur.Berkeley.EDU> lozinski@argon.uucp (Chris Lozinski) writes:

>    From: lozinski@argon.uucp (Chris Lozinski)
>    Newsgroups: comp.object,comp.lang.c++
>    Date: 2 Aug 90 16:01:03 GMT

>    INTRODUCTION

>      After trying Basic, Fortran, Scheme, C, APL, and Objective-C, I 
>    became firmly convinced that Objective-C was the best language
>    choice for the manufacturing applications that I work with.  Then
>    when C++ became a common language, I carefully researched the
>    language, read the manuals, talked to people and generally tried to
>    make a wise long term decision.   This article summarizes the
>    reasons behind my growing conviction that Objective-C is a
>    preferable language to C++ for manufacturing application.  

>    [...Languages review deleted...]

Thanks for this article. What about Eiffel ? Does anybody have an experience of
projects with *both* Eiffel and Objective-C (or Eiffel and C++) ? and care to
comment about it.

Cheers,
Christophe.

 = Got thirteen channels of shit on the T.V. to choose from ...to choose from =