Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!snorkelwacker!bloom-beacon!eru!ulmo1!sow
From: sow@cad.luth.se (Sven-Ove Westberg)
Newsgroups: comp.protocols.tcp-ip.domains
Subject: Re: CS top-level domain and its impact on the UK?
Message-ID: <1551@ulmo1.mt.luth.se>
Date: 30 Jul 90 13:08:42 GMT
References: <1990Jul29.103214.14864@robobar.co.uk> <ENAG.90Jul29224449@slembe.ifi.uio.no> <1990Jul30.095853.21359@lth.se>
Distribution: comp
Organization: University of Lulea, Sweden
Lines: 21

In article <1990Jul30.095853.21359@lth.se> Dan@dna.lth.se (Dan Oscarsson) writes:
|
|Why is janets convension backward???? I think the Internet one is
|backward!!! It feels more right to do it the Janet way.
|

Hmm... Backwards or not why did you write your own address,
"Computer Science, Lund Institute of Technology, Sweden" ????

|Everything that the USA does is not good, just look at what they 
|have done with character sets.

But US creates working code that they distibute free!!! We in 
Europe is experts in large never ending investigations. If we
don't have an valid ISO standard, sit on our ass and wait for it.

And when some kind of mail standard comes (X.400) it did not support
local charactersets in the address field GREAT.

Sven-Ove Westberg, CAD, University of Lulea, S-951 87 Lulea, Sweden.
Internet: sow@cad.luth.se