Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!wuarchive!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!samsung!interlan.InterLan.COM!interlan.interlan.com!towfiq From: towfiq@interlan.Interlan.COM (Mark Towfigh) Newsgroups: comp.protocols.tcp-ip.domains Subject: Re: CS top-level domain and its impact on the UK? Message-ID: Date: 2 Aug 90 20:26:09 GMT References: <1990Jul23.065901.8741@ifi.uio.no> <9007101320.AA03269@dockside.mitre.org> <1532@seti.inria.fr> <1990Aug1.005118.6153@cs.umn.edu> Organization: Racal InterLan, Inc., Boxborough, MA (1-800-LAN-TALK) Lines: 18 In-reply-to: iacovou@cs.umn.edu's message of 1 Aug 90 00:51:18 GMT In article <1990Aug1.005118.6153@cs.umn.edu> iacovou@cs.umn.edu (Danny Iacovou) writes: i am having a hard time trying to see what the problem is with the .CS domain? as i see it the united stated is *flooded* with 'cs machines', we were just told that Czechoslavakia only has 10 UUCP sites. isn't is easier for Csechoslavakia to be issued something like .CZ, .CV, or something? i am very unclear on this point. There is NO PROBLEM between the US machines with CS in their domain name and Czechoslovakia's new top-level name. The problem is with incorrectly-implemented gatewaying between the JANET network and the Internet (fully described by Eric Naggum in another posting). -- Mark Towfigh, Racal InterLan, Inc. towfiq@interlan.Interlan.COM W: (508) 263-9929 H: (617) 488-2818 uunet!interlan!towfiq "The Earth is but One Country, and Mankind its Citizens" -- Baha'u'llah