Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!decwrl!ucbvax!ANDREW.CMU.EDU!bader+ From: bader+@ANDREW.CMU.EDU (Miles Bader) Newsgroups: comp.soft-sys.andrew Subject: Re: ez and GNUemacs. Message-ID: Date: 2 Aug 90 15:39:40 GMT References: Sender: daemon@ucbvax.BERKELEY.EDU Organization: The Internet Lines: 13 Nathaniel Borenstein writes: > Well, those are the arguments I would make, but I think they are > relevant because it was my impression that what you're calling ez was an > evolutionary development, not a whole new program. I believe there is > still code in ez that is recognizably code from the original edittext > and xyzzy; certainly there is a lot left over from bx. Gnumacs, on the > other hand, was a complete rewrite, as I understand it, in order to > follow the GNU philosophy of software unencumbered by any previous > copyright. Apparently, you've never looked too closely at the code for gnu-emacs... -Miles