Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rutgers!uwm.edu!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!sdd.hp.com!decwrl!bacchus.pa.dec.com!decvax.dec.com!zinn!ubbs-nh!siia!drd From: drd@siia.mv.com (David Dick) Newsgroups: comp.sources.d Subject: Re: What documentation is fair/legal to use to develop clone software? Message-ID: <1990Aug2.202407.21438@siia.mv.com> Date: 2 Aug 90 20:24:07 GMT References: <1990Jul19.175923.2015@murdoch.acc.Virginia.EDU> <70K&Z.&@splut.conmicro.com> <1990Jul24.005745.19262@murdoch.acc.Virginia.EDU> Organization: Software Innovations, Inc. Lines: 23 In sean@ms.uky.edu (Sean Casey) writes: >mason@tmsoft.uucp (Dave Mason) writes: >|I am developing a clone of some major AT&T software (exactly *what* is a >|secret for now). I obviously don't want the result legally >|encumbered, as it is to be freely distributable (a la FSF or less >|restrictive rules). >|The question is: What can I base my knowledge on? >And so it begins. How horribly sad that programmers even have to ask such >questions. There is nothing sad or horrible about it. Doctors and lawyers ask their colleagues questions about ethics from time to time; are programmers to be less professional or less ethical? David Dick Software Innovations, Inc. [the Software Moving Company(sm)] drd@siia.mv.com -or- uunet!siia!alton!drdick