Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!usc!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!unix.cis.pitt.edu!dsinc!netnews.upenn.edu!kings.wharton.upenn.edu!lau From: lau@kings.wharton.upenn.edu (Yan K. Lau) Newsgroups: comp.sources.wanted Subject: Re: Sexist (the program) Message-ID: <27645@netnews.upenn.edu> Date: 31 Jul 90 18:18:45 GMT References: <4286@uqcspe.cs.uq.oz.au> <-286629990@hpcupt1.HP.COM> Sender: news@netnews.upenn.edu Reply-To: lau@kings.wharton.upenn.edu (Yan K. Lau) Organization: A Private Heaven Lines: 31 In article <-286629990@hpcupt1.HP.COM> swh@hpcupt1.HP.COM (Steve Harrold) writes: >>>> I believe there is a program called sexist that locates phrases and words >>>> that do not belong in the New-English. If anyone has a public-domain/free > ^^^^^^ >>>> copy of this that they would like to give away, could they mail me. I will > ^^^^ ^^^^ >>>> ask the closest person to mail me the source. > >Ah, but does this program catch grammatical errors committed to avoid >sexist pronouns, such as above? :-) I know there is a smiley attached to this so I won't get too worked up over it but I hope the use of "they" was intentional in the sentence. There is a very good discussion of the problems and the origins of using "he" in _The Handbook of Nonsexist Writing_ by Casey Miller and Kate Swift. "Once upon a time you was a plural pronoun only. It assumed its singular function (replacing thou) in the days before prescriptive grammarians were around to inhibit that kind of change. English needs a comparable third person singular pronoun and, for many, they meets the need:" The book is very good and has suggestions for getting around the pronoun problem. Unfortunately, using "they" doesn't seem to be generally accepted. I always wonder if I should point out that the use is intentional. Yan. )~ Yan K. Lau lau@kings.wharton.upenn.edu The Wharton School ~/~ -Sheenaphile- 128.91.11.233 University of Pennsylvania /\ God/Goddess/All that is -- the source of love, light and inspiration!