Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!mcsun!hp4nl!orcenl!bengsig
From: bengsig@oracle.nl (Bjorn Engsig)
Newsgroups: comp.std.c
Subject: Re: vprintf()
Message-ID: <924@nlsun1.oracle.nl>
Date: 31 Jul 90 11:04:07 GMT
References: <CHIN.90Jul28003642@ankh.ankh.ftl.fl.us> <1990Jul28.211947.3795@zoo.toronto.edu> <13450@smoke.BRL.MIL> <1990Jul30.182656.19169@zoo.toronto.edu>
Reply-To: bengsig@oracle.nl (Bjorn Engsig)
Organization: Oracle Europe, The Netherlands
Lines: 17

In articles <1990Jul30.182656.19169@zoo.toronto.edu> and <13450@smoke.BRL.MIL> 
henry@zoo.toronto.edu (Henry Spencer) and gwyn@smoke.BRL.MIL (Doug Gwyn) have
a discussion:

Doug:
|You don't have to include <stdarg.h> to get vprintf() properly defined,
|just <stdio.h>...
Henry:
|Can you prove this?

Isn't it wonderful for the rest of us that the guru's also disagree sometimes?
What about Karl or Chris, don't you have a comment to this interesting discus-
sion.  I would very much like to know if I need to include <stdarg.h> in all
those sources where I only need to define vprintf() but don't call it :-)
-- 
Bjorn Engsig,	Domain:		bengsig@oracle.nl, bengsig@oracle.com
		Path:		uunet!mcsun!orcenl!bengsig