Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!cornell!uw-beaver!ubc-cs!alberta!ccu!rpjday
From: rpjday@ccu.umanitoba.ca
Newsgroups: comp.std.c
Subject: Re: the "const" qualifier
Message-ID: <1990Aug2.013333.1713@ccu.umanitoba.ca>
Date: 2 Aug 90 01:33:33 GMT
References: <1990Aug1.005200.21645@ccu.umanitoba.ca> <13462@smoke.BRL.MIL> <1990Aug2.011735.1143@ccu.umanitoba.ca>
Organization: University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Canada
Lines: 14

In article <1990Aug2.011735.1143@ccu.umanitoba.ca> rpjday@ccu.umanitoba.ca writes:
>OK, now that I managed to make a total fool of myself with a well-placed
>typo, let me try to prove that I am not a complete cement-head.

.
.
.

Never mind, it has been pointed out to me that the relevant section
deals with lvalues and function designators (3.2.2.1).  NOW it makes
sense.  thanks to all who mailed. 

R. Day
U of Manitoba