Path: utzoo!attcan!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rutgers!cs.utexas.edu!uunet!van-bc! From: lphillips@lpami.wimsey.bc.ca (Larry Phillips) Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga Subject: Re: A3000 and BYTE magazine Message-ID: <1840@lpami.wimsey.bc.ca> Date: 2 Aug 90 22:16:37 GMT Lines: 27 Return-Path: To: van-bc!rnews In <2342@dsacg3.dsac.dla.mil>, nfs1675@dsacg3.dsac.dla.mil ( Michael S Figg) writes: > >Call me old fashion, but isn't it more significant what the machine can do >than how many pages it gets in BYTE. Yes it is, though you couldn't prove it by the results of the folks who make up the pages of Byte. Seems their criteria is that the more it can do, the better the technology, the worse the coverage. > Besides if coverage in Byte was that >important, The Amiga would probably be long dead by now, and most of us >would be using Mac's. Don't look now, but 'most of us' are not using Amigas, depending a lot, of course, on your definition of 'us'. Some of that situation is due to the popular magazines and their near total ignorance of anything outside the wonderful world of Microsoft and IBM and their imitators. -larry -- Sex is better than logic, but I can't prove it. +-----------------------------------------------------------------------+ | // Larry Phillips | | \X/ lphillips@lpami.wimsey.bc.ca -or- uunet!van-bc!lpami!lphillips | | COMPUSERVE: 76703,4322 -or- 76703.4322@compuserve.com | +-----------------------------------------------------------------------+