Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!aplcen!uakari.primate.wisc.edu!uflorida!stat!sun13!hudgens
From: hudgens@sun13.scri.fsu.edu (Jim Hudgens)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.dec
Subject: Re: Compiler Bug
Message-ID: <329@sun13.scri.fsu.edu>
Date: 30 Jul 90 18:10:15 GMT
References: <327@sun13.scri.fsu.edu> <3152@rwthinf.UUCP> <5889@crltrx.crl.dec.com> <1990Jul30.165432.9590@decatl.dec.com>
Distribution: na
Organization: SCRI, Florida State University
Lines: 30

In article <1990Jul30.165432.9590@decatl.dec.com> hoyt@laura.alf.dec.com (Kurt Hoyt) writes:
>In article <327@sun13.scri.fsu.edu>, hudgens@sun13.scri.fsu.edu (Jim Hudgens) writes:
>> Under Ultrix 4.0, we get this behavior:
>
>[program deleted]
>
>I'm running ULTRIX 4.0, and I get:
>
> [[ dang, it works for him ]]
>
>Which 4.0 (mine says rev 174)? Which cc version? Which CPU type?
>


Hmmm.  We're running 4.0, rev 174.  Same cc version as yourself
(cc2.0).  R5000 CPU.  I think it was a pretty straightforward 
installation.  I tried it on 3 machines up here (all R5000's), 
and got exactly the same results.  Perhaps we've messed up one of 
the libraries.  Anyone else get these results?  

Apologies in advance if this turns out to be a local problem...




-- 
---
Disclaimer:  I didn't do it.
Jim Hudgens		Supercomputer Computations Research Institute
hudgens@sun13.scri.fsu.edu