Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!mad.cis.ohio-state.edu!jrm From: jrm@mad.cis.ohio-state.edu (John R. Mudd) Newsgroups: comp.sys.encore Subject: Re: process arguments Message-ID: <82689@tut.cis.ohio-state.edu> Date: 3 Aug 90 16:00:18 GMT References: <9632@xenna.Xylogics.COM> Sender: news@tut.cis.ohio-state.edu Reply-To: John R. Mudd Organization: The Ohio State University Dept. of Computer & Information Science Lines: 18 In article <9632@xenna.Xylogics.COM> John Robert LoVerso writes: >An alternative would be to run MACH on your Multimax, which, for all >pratical purposes, is a superset of BSD. As such, it provides the same >kmem abilities as 4.3BSD. True, but when will Mach release 0.6 *ever* be released? It was supposedly to be out in Q1 '90. I think it's wonderful that Encore offers Mach as an alternative to Umax, but these interminable delays are starting to get annoying. I'm starting to get the feeling that no one at Encore besides the Ultramax/Mach group cares anymore. ... John .......................................................................... John R. Mudd jrm@cis.ohio-state.edu Department of Computer and Information Science, The Ohio State University 2036 Neil Avenue, Columbus, Ohio, USA 43210-1277 +1 614 292 7161