Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!cs.utexas.edu!ut-emx!walt.cc.utexas.edu!petrilli From: petrilli@walt.cc.utexas.edu (Chris Petrilli) Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware Subject: Re: Compatibility: Laserjet II, II/D, III ? Message-ID: <34710@ut-emx.UUCP> Date: 31 Jul 90 02:45:39 GMT References: <3964@rex.cs.tulane.edu> Sender: news@ut-emx.UUCP Reply-To: petrilli@walt.cc.utexas.edu (Chris Petrilli) Distribution: usa Organization: The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas Lines: 31 I didn't want to include the entire message, so here is my experiences with the HP LaserJet II and III. First, teh differences between each: LaserJet II - 512K RAM, with 68000 based imaging system. Limited to bitmapped fonts, and bitmapped images, and what could be described using HP PCL4, which is limited. A nice replacement for a daisywheel but nothing compared to PostScript. LaserJet IIP - 512K version with 4PPM capability, not really in my mind worth the cost, especially when you can get IIs for $1690... LaserJey IID - DOUBLE SIDED LaserJet II, with 640K of RAM as I recall. It requires software support for double sided in reality, but as I recall can do it by itself also. LaserJet III - (this is what I have now) 1Mb RAM and a 68000 (at 10MHz as I recall). It uses PCL5 which can interpret font outlines (and includes 4) and basically handle text with the best of the PostScirpt printers. THe image enhancement is comparable to what LaserMaster does in that it varies the dot size and gets an effective resolution of 600x300 (a little higher I think). This is well worth the cost in my opinion, and is one of the best buys on the market, I think. + Chris Petrilli "Opinons represented here | University of Texas at Austin do not necessarily | INTERNET: petrilli@ccwf.cc.utexas.edu represent those of a sane | SNAILMAIL: 429 Brady Lane, Austin, Texas, 78746 person. Take them as + PHONE: +1 512 327 0986 simply that."