Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rutgers!usc!chaph.usc.edu!nunki.usc.edu!wilber
From: wilber@nunki.usc.edu (John Wilber)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac.apps
Subject: Re: Norton Utilties Shipped (But Still Buggy)
Summary: Picking Nits
Message-ID: <11148@chaph.usc.edu>
Date: 31 Jul 90 09:46:08 GMT
References: <19270@well.sf.ca.us> <11117@chaph.usc.edu> <846@earth.cs.utexas.edu>
Sender: news@chaph.usc.edu
Distribution: comp
Organization: University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA
Lines: 7
Nntp-Posting-Host: nunki.usc.edu

In article <846@earth.cs.utexas.edu> werner@cs.utexas.edu (Werner Uhrig) writes:
>ps: all the original article said was: "don't expect it to be perfect",
>	and I can hardly see why anyone would object to that statement.

Maybe I'm just picking nits, but in the Subject line it said "Buggy".  Of 
course no product is "perfect", but claims that NUM is buggy are far from
the truth, as I am sure lots of people here can testify to.