Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!uunet!ficc!peter From: peter@ficc.ferranti.com (Peter da Silva) Newsgroups: comp.unix.i386 Subject: Re: Graphic characters in Norton Utilities SYS-V Keywords: Norton Utilities, graphic characters Message-ID: Date: 30 Jul 90 19:38:13 GMT References: <175@hafro.is> <1990Jul26.011852.1180@esegue.segue.boston.ma.us> <1990Jul27.104059.12955@pegasus.com> <1990Jul27.165315.13531@esegue.segue.boston.ma.us> <1OY4DT3@xds13.ferranti.com> <1990Jul29.235310.6138@pcrat.uucp> Reply-To: peter@ficc.ferranti.com (Peter da Silva) Organization: Xenix Support, FICC Lines: 14 In article <1990Jul29.235310.6138@pcrat.uucp> rick@pcrat.UUCP (Rick Richardson) writes: > see anything wrong with making console response as snappy as > console response under, say, DOS. Modulo the fact that the > necessary console ioctl's are totally non-portable between > the various UNIXes. Plus, it'll break on a console driver that isn't quite what you're expecting (such as the font problem that started this discussion, or an unknown graphic card (say, IBM's new "XGA" standard). The biggest problem with DOS is that it encourages programs to do this sort of thing... and they break on the next generation, or on imperfect clones, or whatever. Applications should not have to replace the O/S, and on UNIX they don't. -- Peter da Silva. `-_-' +1 713 274 5180. 'U`