Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!samsung!uakari.primate.wisc.edu!uflorida!mephisto!prism!gt0159a From: gt0159a@prism.gatech.EDU (LEVINSON,MARC LOUIS) Newsgroups: comp.windows.ms Subject: Re: SHARE and Excel 2.1C upgrade Message-ID: <12150@hydra.gatech.EDU> Date: 2 Aug 90 23:04:42 GMT References: Distribution: na Organization: Georgia Institute of Technology Lines: 48 In article marshall@wind55.seri.gov (Marshall L. Buhl) writes: >installation process, but when SETUP went to read the second disk, it >said it was defective. > >I tested it with Norton Disk Doctor. I copied it to another disk. No >Then it dawned on me that MS can't create a Setup program that will run >when their own SHARE program is loaded. I renamed SHARE.EXE to S.EXE >and rebooted. Everything worked fine. > >Why the hell can't MS warn people about this when they send out the >upgrade? This cost me nearly an hour - not counting this flame. > I had the same problem and spent a phone call to Microsoft about it! Win3 made meload SHARE for the first time ever (Compaq DOS 3.3) and I forgot it was running. The tech rep cleared it up right away, told me to kill SHARE for thew install. Now to me, this seems STUPID!!! Why? because Windows 3 requires share to be loaded. I asked the tech rep why a warning about SHARE was not on the upgrade letter/instructions or in the README file and his answer was, MS: "We don't want to badmouth anybody elses product" to which I replied, ml: WHOSE? MS: "IBM PCDOS" ml: BUT Microsoft licenced DOS to IBM and includes (or wrote) SHARE with every copy of their operating system. Besides, Win3 REQUIRES SHARE to be loaded, therefore somebody should have added a warning instead of causing unneccessarry disk error messages. MS: "we did not want to cause alarm" ml: Tell Mr. Gates to get his departments coordinated, it's a hell of a lot cheaper to print or type one sentance than to have the technicians spend half their time answerinf STUPID questions for errors which should not have occured! I can't badmouth Microsoft too much. Sure they use a lot of *CHEAP* quality (read: bad, not functional, not readable) distribution diskettes, but has anybody else in TV land ever received a faster mail in upgrade than Win3? Igot mine in less than two weeks from the day I mailed in the form (from Florida - east coast all the way to Seattle). -- LEVINSON,MARC LOUIS Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta Georgia, 30332 uucp: ...!{allegra,amd,hplabs,seismo,ut-ngp}!gatech!prism!gt0159a ARPA: gt0159a@prism.gatech.edu or marc@isye.gatech.edu