Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!cs.utexas.edu!samsung!usc!snorkelwacker!bloom-beacon!THINK.COM!rlk
From: rlk@THINK.COM (Robert L Krawitz)
Newsgroups: comp.windows.x
Subject: Why are all of the free Widgets so ugly looking?
Message-ID: <9007272243.AA23742@underprize.think.com>
Date: 27 Jul 90 22:43:07 GMT
References: <768@auto-trol.UUCP>
Sender: rlk@think.com
Organization: The Internet
Lines: 14


   Date: 27 Jul 90 14:23:58 GMT
   From: snorkelwacker!usc!elroy.jpl.nasa.gov!ncar!ico!auto-trol!marbru@bloom-beacon.mit.edu  (Martin Brunecky)

   In article <90Jul27.021210edt.6918@neat.cs.toronto.edu> moraes@cs.toronto.edu (Mark Moraes) writes:
   >
   >Some of us *LIKE* the VOML&F.  We have better things on which to waste
   >CPU cycles and VM than drawing 3d/art-deco widgets...

     What about a compromise: decent 3d look which does NOT vaste resources
     (not only CPU cycles) the way Motif does ?

How about those of us who hate twm because of the title bars?  Many of
us did just fine on uwm (the icon manager is a win, though).