Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!ncar!boulder!daemon
From: ellozy%farber@bess.HARVARD.EDU (Mohamed Ellozy)
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.sys.cisco
Subject: Bridging LAT
Message-ID: <24455@boulder.Colorado.EDU>
Date: 8 Aug 90 05:50:50 GMT
Sender: daemon@boulder.Colorado.EDU
Lines: 10

We bridge a lot of LAT terminal traffic through our Cisco routers, and I have
noticed that whenever I reconfigure the router all LAT connections are dropped.
Is this normal/expected behavior?  I have heard that LAT is very sensitive to
timings.  SHould I expect the problem to go away if I used telnet instead
(most of my terminal servers are LAT/telnet servers)?  How much more resources
would telnet use than LAT (bandwidth and processor CPU)?

Many thanks.

Mohamed